| 3.1 Lack of media naturalness (individuals cannot use all their natural senses to communicate such as face expression and gesture) creates cognitive distance |
| |
Major impact |
11 |
14% |
| |
Average impact |
35 |
46% |
| |
Minor impact |
27 |
36% |
| |
No impact |
2 |
2% |
| |
Total |
75 |
|
| 3.2 Lack of common description (e.g. concepts, references, taxonomy …) – creates conceptual distance |
| |
Major impact |
34 |
45% |
| |
Average impact |
32 |
42% |
| |
Minor impact |
9 |
12% |
| |
No impact |
0 |
|
| |
Total |
75 |
|
| 3.3 Multi-platform setting (e.g. type of devices, OS,…) – creates referential distance |
| |
Major impact |
7 |
9% |
| |
Average impact |
30 |
40% |
| |
Minor impact |
35 |
46% |
| |
No impact |
3 |
4% |
| |
Total |
75 |
|
| 3.4 Lack of meaning – creates semantic distance |
| |
Major impact |
33 |
44% |
| |
Average impact |
32 |
42% |
| |
Minor impact |
9 |
12% |
| |
No impact |
1 |
1% |
| |
Total |
75 |
|
| 3.5 Unbalanced technological usage and expertise – creates technological distance |
| |
Major impact |
20 |
26% |
| |
Average impact |
43 |
57% |
| |
Minor impact |
9 |
12% |
| |
No impact |
3 |
4% |
| |
Total |
75 |
|
| 3.6 Lack of contextualised operational mode (context awareness) – creates contextual distance |
| |
Major impact |
19 |
25% |
| |
Average impact |
39 |
52% |
| |
Minor impact |
16 |
21% |
| |
No impact |
1 |
1% |
| |
Total |
75 |
|